29 ms·
Having actually watched the video which seems to be rare in this debate there was really nothing bad or misleading about the content. He genuinely reviews the p
by ZhadruOmjar 2y ago
Having actually watched the video which seems to be rare in this debate there was really nothing bad or misleading about the content. He genuinely reviews the product and shows it working without any editing or magic. It's an exploratory product that just doesn't work that well and as others have said if it had redeeming aspects surely the fanboys would be jumping to the product's defence. The people criticising MKBHD seem to be upset he would not blindly support the company rather than providing anything good about the product. New products get dragged all the time, it's part of launching in the modern world but it's up to the business to prove them wrong.
- waihtis 2y ago100% spot on. What I gathered from the review was that the tech itself is really cool but usability was bad (faster to pull out your phone, take a pic and google it vs the image recognition, battery life of 2-4 hrs, etc.) I also found the reviewers tone to be very mild, it's definitely not outrage-driven. I also applaud the efforts of the aipin folk to try to build something new. They probably raised too much for it to be true but maybe if they fixed the fatal UX flaws they could regain some momentum. Altogether it's just a bit puzzling why this whole outrage has manifested itself
- wahnfrieden 2y agoThe tech was bad also
- blitzar 2y agoI am yet to watch the MKBHD review of the Apple Vision, but I can safely assume it is very much along the same lines ...