Why do we assume cash ? It can be in kind, we already do this a bit current donors get preferred for donations when they need it themselves. Why cannot we ext

Why do we assume cash ? It can be in kind, we already do this a bit current donors get preferred for donations when they need it themselves. Why cannot we extend that and say entire health care expenses for the rest of the donor’s life the state will take care for example ? it doesn’t even have to in. full , they can even just improve coverage , and make insurance companies remove restrictions like pre-existing conditions for such donors . There are plenty of benefits like this the state can do, perhaps tax credits , exemptions, priority in any government program , cheaper mortgages and so on , even private sector can step in with benefits like we do for veterans. I think the point is not to pay and make it an economic transaction , but to reward I.e. incentivize people to do donate more. The benefits can also extend to next of kin like say financial aid for college etc(donors shouldn’t be that young to directly benefit from education aid)it would then also factor for non living donors