4 ms·
I'm a bit skeptical that this in particular is a major issue, for the sole reason that fuselage joint shims, tolerances, bends, and fasteners on the 787 have be
by bri3d 3y ago
I'm a bit skeptical that this in particular is a major issue, for the sole reason that fuselage joint shims, tolerances, bends, and fasteners on the 787 have been under a ridiculous level of scrutiny since 2019 and earlier: https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/new-boeing-787-fix-details-reveal-extent-gap-check-challenge https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/new-boeing-787-fix-de...
It's clear that Boeing have awful quality control issues, but this one seems like it's already been investigated extensively. I absolutely believe that non-approved, dangerous procedures were used to fit 787 panels together, but this was known 5+ years ago and heavily investigated.
Of course, that doesn't justify retribution against a whistleblower. Which is all to say - I do believe Boeing are deeply questionable as an organization, but I'd still be comfortable flying on a 787.
- coliveira 3y agoFrom what I understood, the problem is not how the job has been done, but the design of the fuselage itself that can fall apart with time. The solution is to inspect several of these airplanes to make sure that the joints are in good condition.