4 ms·
I agree with this, it is a bit more than 30MB but we're splitting hairs at this point. For gaming traffic, it should absolutely be prioritised because reduced
by NoPicklez 3y ago
I agree with this, it is a bit more than 30MB but we're splitting hairs at this point.
For gaming traffic, it should absolutely be prioritised because reduced lag provides the best experience.
Having said that, given there is such a small amount of traffic produced from gaming, why not just make it prioritised already?
- Vvector 3y ago"Why give something away for free if you could charge for it?"
- hparadiz 3y agoExhibit A for why ISPs should be classified as utilities.
- NoPicklez 3y agoI think as another person pointed out I don't mind so much if I can pay for improved latency, but if the standard service provided is purposefully degraded to justify it then that's when it's iffy There would also need to be some serious data to support an actual benefit compared to the standard latency
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 3y agoCool, since gaming is not important they are going to charge 200$/month for it. How do you feel now? Because that's what's happening with datacaps, they are charging hundreds of dollars per month because there is no unlimited data on gigabit connections. Meanwhile, in Italy you at 5€/month for 50gb of phone internet. And that's sticker price!