> Whereas most works seem to have a thesis and then explore them on different levels, Lynch seems to just throw out ideas in different scenes. Many interpretat

> Whereas most works seem to have a thesis and then explore them on different levels, Lynch seems to just throw out ideas in different scenes. Many interpretations come to the exact opposite conclusion: that Lynch starts with a specific idea and then visits it in a different way in each scene. They may seem different, but there is an underlying theme. At least, if those interpretations are right. Here is an example for Inland Empire: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkk9GWonTyg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkk9GWonTyg Try to ignore that person's overconfidence, he does actually make a good case for his interpretation, I think, showing that the film can be seen as boiling down to one clear main message. (I don't agree with all of his points, but I do think he is on to something.) > I would love to unpack what parts of twin peaks were Lynch’s design and what parts were not Reading Mark Frost's books can help there, as likely Lynch's influence on them is minimal. But it is still hard to unpack, Twin Peaks was really a joint project.