3 ms·
Can you elaborate why Redis has supplanted Memcached? Is it because Redis occupies a space in between Memcached and MemcacheDB? (in the sense of Redis can be bo
by edwinnathaniel 14y ago
Can you elaborate why Redis has supplanted Memcached? Is it because Redis occupies a space in between Memcached and MemcacheDB? (in the sense of Redis can be both in-memory and/or persisted on disk?)
(Not that I care about starting the holy war of X vs Y, just out of curiosity why)
You have a point regarding your last statement. Perhaps I've been here far too long to notice more of the 10% and less on the 90% :)
... which is true ... last I read someone is making almost $1M revenue developing Windows desktop app in 2012 and another company is making $60k/monthly revenue developing BB apps using in-apps Ads. I think I'm going to sign-off on HN and go to the other side... :D :D :D
- aneth 14y agoRedis is far more feature-ful, and can serve the purpose as memcache. Why have two parts when you only need one? Redis offers persistence, set operations, namespacing, you can delete multiple entries with wildcards...