3 ms·
I think it reflects Graham’s interest in the quality of technical communication (business communication being a subset thereof) more than anything else. That’s
by brudgers 3y ago
I think it reflects Graham’s interest in the quality of technical communication (business communication being a subset thereof) more than anything else.
That’s his background as a writer and essayist. It’s not a commentary on poetry or fiction.
Of course Stephen King once applied it to all writing. Personally, it’s hard for me to buy King as literary snob (though his being a bad writer is a question about which people can reasonably disagree).
These days I think of these as first draft words. They express my ideas, but are candidates of change when editing. YMMV. I don’t find it worth being angry about either way.
- foldr 3y agoStephen King was saying that writers shouldn't deliberately seek out fancy words just to sound fancier. PG seems to have a certain set of trigger words which are well-known and which many people would use without a second thought, such as "delve" or "burgeon".