> edit: I was wrong. If the only reason you were "wrong" was because you intuitively understood that it wasn't worth a large amount of valuable human time to s

> edit: I was wrong. If the only reason you were "wrong" was because you intuitively understood that it wasn't worth a large amount of valuable human time to save a small amount of cheap machine time, you were right in the way that matters (time allocation) and should keep it up :)