Would that be a bad thing? If you want the convenience you either pay for something that is proven correct or you take the inefficiency of paper (under your imp

Would that be a bad thing? If you want the convenience you either pay for something that is proven correct or you take the inefficiency of paper (under your implicit assumption that it's somehow invulnerable to error, burning down, etc), or you accept that you take the convenience but will not be able to use it in court as evidence. If you suspect somebody is stealing, you could always take further measures like switching to magical paper that can't go wrong, or set regular inspections, or new procedures, etc. Don't pretend that fucking over innocent lives in the pursuit of profits is a law of nature.