12 ms·

The barrier to creation is now far, far lower. Just a few face pictures and some idea of their body type, and you've got an instant nude. Children younger than

The barrier to creation is now far, far lower. Just a few face pictures and some idea of their body type, and you've got an instant nude. Children younger than 10 need to be taught the concept of consent and privacy, and how upsetting it is for people whose privacy and consent are violated. It ties into cliques and bullying, too. Teens can be brutal in their bullying and fake nude pictures will be added to the arsenal of abusive actions. Some of this stems from unrestricted usage of computers by minors who don't understand the impact their actions might have. Better parental tools and parents/guardians who take this topic seriously would be beneficial too. (I'm not arguing for some locked-down console instead of standard PCs, I just think that parents need to be able to know what their kids are doing online)

chrisjj 3y ago
> people whose privacy and consent are violated No privacy is violated by this act. Consent violation is nonsensical.
antisthenes 3y ago
> The barrier to creation is now far, far lower. That's not a good argument for creating this legislature. It couldn't really be enforced before (photoshopped images of celebrities), and it certainly can't be enforced now when any "script kiddie" will be able to generate terabytes worth of deepfakes in a week, and launch them to circulate on the internet anonymously. Unless you institute some draconian measures like only being able to access the internet with a passport and having 10% of your workforce work in censorship.