4 ms·
Except that neither human nor satellite distribution is even across the global surface, and we actually tend to put our satellites above the human-populated are
by ang_cire 3y ago
Except that neither human nor satellite distribution is even across the global surface, and we actually tend to put our satellites above the human-populated areas so that they can service those humans.
Including the nigh-unpopulated polar regions would massively skew the probabilities, for instance, especially since most satellites aren't in polar orbits either. It's still an infinitesimally small likelihood of being hit by one, of course.