4 ms·
c++ and rust are the same: computer languages with an ultra-complex syntax requiring absurdely gigantic compilers. This is not a case of one is better than the
by sylware 3y ago
c++ and rust are the same: computer languages with an ultra-complex syntax requiring absurdely gigantic compilers.
This is not a case of one is better than the other:
Both are actually quite toxic (the word is fair) for this very reason, and it is already enough. It is time to grow up and acknowledge that.
- sylware 3y ago[flagged]
- jimswhims 3y agoWhat's best, in your opinion.. C, Golang, Python..?
- sylware 3y agoIt depends on the type of software of course. But the chosen 'computer language' should be simple enough to allow reasonable real life alternative implementations. The current C syntax is usually the less worse compromise. C syntax is already too complex, and ISO should simplify it instead of provoking feature creep on a cycle of 5-10 years cycle (this is sneaky planned obsolesence). Python syntax is supposed to be simple, but some parts seems horrible expensive (syntax integrated custom regexp). C should be simplified: no integer promotion, no implicit cast (except for literals like rust, void*), only explicit static or dynamic casts (without that horrible c++ syntax), hard compiler constants, one loop keyword, no switch, no enum, only sized types, etc. The migration path would use C standard version switch of compilers.