4 ms·
That's actually right, S3 costing at $39k/month seems completely crazy. No wonder 37signals decided to switch to their self-hosted storage solution[1]. [1] ht
by teoruiz 14y ago
That's actually right, S3 costing at $39k/month seems completely crazy.
No wonder 37signals decided to switch to their self-hosted storage solution[1].
[1] http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2483-nuts-bolts-storage http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2483-nuts-bolts-storage
- PanMan 14y agoAs they just raised 100 million, I wonder if putting (a lot of) effort in replicating S3's functions to save part of 40K/month is worth the trouble. And setting that up won't be free either. (their 100 million can pay for the current storage for 200 years...)