> You question his competence. > He was answering that. > If instead of dismissing someone outright and question their competence, you had raised specific conce

> You question his competence. > He was answering that. > If instead of dismissing someone outright and question their competence, you had raised specific concerns, this would have been a more productive conversation he first said that we don't need to monitor anything, just enable debugging when "business metrics" are failing, and then he changed his stance to "polling from time to time". that's just shows that his first take wasn't thoughtful, so I assumed that he never worked in "the field" or worked on smaller projects, as nobody that worked in bigger projects would say that "we don't need CPU/mem/hdd metrics". it's not like hes proposing something novel, that just ridiculous take that needs to be called out