2 ms·
> But you're assuming Nazi ideology was coherent I very explicitly said it's not: "A lot of the Nazi rhetoric isn't even internally consistent and it was all a
by arp242 3y ago
> But you're assuming Nazi ideology was coherent
I very explicitly said it's not: "A lot of the Nazi rhetoric isn't even internally consistent and it was all a load of bollocks"
Are you even reading what I'm writing? Your unhinged ridiculous accusations which directly contradicts what I wrote suggests you're not.
I did not mention or talk about contemporary antisemitism. Don't try to twist things.
And yes, obviously "they treated the Dutch, English etc. better" excludes Jews. It also excludes communists, and gays, and some other groups. This is a boring "gotcha" type argument.
- greedo 3y agoYou literally said: "It's not; anti-Semitism as we know today is very much rooted in racial science (well, "science") of the 19th century." So yes, you were talking about contemporary anti-semitism.
- arp242 3y agoAnti-Semitism in the context of what we're talking about. There are many different flavours of antisemitism: from Judeophobia to unhinged criticism of the Israeli state to racial. And all of those can be further subdivided. All of these are very different and worth commenting on, but all I did was describe anti-Semitism as viewed by the Nazi world-view and some background on that. That is the only thing I'm talking about. I don't think I need to include an essay on antisemitism to make such a point.