3 ms·
Talking about it being the "mark of the beast" is a strawman. What you should talk about instead to win support among those same groups of people is to explain
by ImAnAmateur 3y ago
Talking about it being the "mark of the beast" is a strawman. What you should talk about instead to win support among those same groups of people is to explain how it isn't/wouldn't be a means of government abuse. They're worried about it backdooring personal financial freedom the same way you would worry about the government backdooring encryption.
- yieldcrv 3y agoIt’s not a strawman if thats exactly what the people being referred to will say. But semantics aside, I agree that addressing their actual concerns is more productive. And there is no way to guarantee that.
- ImAnAmateur 3y agoYou're right about it not being a strawman. I used the wrong word.