The journalist seems to have submitted the article for publishing by mistake as well. > Lawyers for Mrs Williams argued that as the order had been made by mist

The journalist seems to have submitted the article for publishing by mistake as well. > Lawyers for Mrs Williams argued that as the order had been made by mistake it should simply be "set aside", describing the error as someone at the firm simply "clicking the wrong button". [missing paragraphs describing what the hell happened.] > Mr Williams' legal representatives argued a final order of divorce is a "once-and-for-all" order, which cannot be set aside by the consent of the parties and may only be rescinded by the court if found to be either void or voidable.