3 ms·
I feel it's fair to filter out writing that is fully AI without human proofing. That's because that writing is awful. However, assuming an author competently e
by barfbagginus 3y ago
I feel it's fair to filter out writing that is fully AI without human proofing. That's because that writing is awful.
However, assuming an author competently edits and proofs the final work, I don't need or want to know if they used AI. Just like I don't need to know if they used a human intern, editor, or other co-author - assuming the co-author did not demand attribution.
Let's stick to worrying about lazy and incompetent authors. There is no reason to penalize otherwise competent authors for co-authoring with AI.
Prediction: This is going to hurt medium, by driving off competent AI assisted writers. They will find inclusive platforms.
And frankly I'm glad. Medium is a plague on the internet, and needs to die horribly. This is the way.