> But instead, we focus on the far less feasible "how can we stop people from using so much post-industrial technology?" That's a strawman. I assume you're tak

> But instead, we focus on the far less feasible "how can we stop people from using so much post-industrial technology?" That's a strawman. I assume you're taking about degrowth loons on social media. Why would you do that? In the real world, policymakers and center-left political parties (and center-right parties outside of the US) do not want people to stop using technology. What policymakers are trying to do is shift from one technology (oil and gas) to another technology (firmed renewables or nuclear). The reason for this is to maximize human flourishing by preventing wet bulb temperatures near the equator from becoming too large relative to the 31-35 degree survivability limit, among other consequences which you can read about elsewhere.