3 ms·
of course they have to enforce other peoples licenses, otherwise they're distributing stolen code. It's AGPL, which is probably not compatible with the app stor
by asddubs 3y ago
of course they have to enforce other peoples licenses, otherwise they're distributing stolen code. It's AGPL, which is probably not compatible with the app store license, and the code by Delta is also distributed under a custom license forbidding uploading to the app store. I don't think it's a non-standard AGPL clause, it's just multi-licensing in a very informal way
- lxgr 3y agoYou can't multi-license other people's GPL-ed code (without them explicitly re-licensing it to you allowing that, in any case).
- asddubs 3y agoThe wording: >That being said, I explicitly give permission for anyone to use, modify, and distribute all _my original code_ for this project in any form, with or without attribution, without fear of legal consequences — unless you plan to submit your app to Apple’s App Store, in which case written permission from me is explicitly required. so they're not doing that
- lxgr 3y agoThat’s one read of the implicit brackets here, and maybe the intended one, but I think the ambiguity next to “fear of legal consequences” might make a lawyer a bit nervous.