2 ms·
It's allowed since it strictly grants additional permissions. If Apple allowed GPL code then the restriction wouldn't be valid, but as it is it is only a restr
by o11c 3y ago
It's allowed since it strictly grants additional permissions.
If Apple allowed GPL code then the restriction wouldn't be valid, but as it is it is only a restriction to the additional permission.
- lxgr 3y ago> It's allowed since it strictly grants additional permissions. From the repo: > written permission from me is explicitly required That does not sound like an additional permission to me.
- o11c 3y agoIt's only a restriction to the "that being said" clause; it does not affect the GPL possibility.
- lxgr 3y agoIt's at least very ambiguously worded, and a lot of confusion could be avoided by just explicitly stating it as "License: AGPLv2 (everything); additional/optional license for parts written by me: do-what-you-want-but-email-me-for-app-store license v0.1".