2 ms·
I'm not sure how much value making something "not fugly" really matters. Design should be based on functionality, not anti-fugliness. In my experience, design c
by boplicity 2y ago
I'm not sure how much value making something "not fugly" really matters. Design should be based on functionality, not anti-fugliness. In my experience, design considerations should come after building a successful growth "feedback loop." (Or whatever you want to call it.) At that point, you may decide making your website look "polished" isn't even necessary.
IMDB was certainly quite ugly for a long time. See:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100712165326/http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000352/ https://web.archive.org/web/20100712165326/http://www.imdb.c...
Other examples of extremely successful, low design sites:
https://archiveofourown.org/ https://archiveofourown.org/
https://news.ycombinator.com/ https://news.ycombinator.com/
- gremlinunderway 2y ago>I'm not sure how much value making something "not fugly" really matters. Eh its still good advice. Far too often decent UX/UI criticism is waved aside as "who cares about making it pretty" and aesthetics and useability very often go hand-in-hand.