> and would be quite disappointed if there aren't at least three companies working it right now Why does it need three companies working on it? Isn't this just

> and would be quite disappointed if there aren't at least three companies working it right now Why does it need three companies working on it? Isn't this just a matter of prompt engineering? I've never played with an LLM, so I really don't know. Perhaps it requires some ordinary linear code to produce a "comprehensive test suite". Ultimately, the problem I can't see 3 or 300 companies solving, is the correct interpretation of technical instructions in English. Native English speakers have trouble with that, and I doubt that a machine can out-perform a native speaker. Maybe I'm wrong, and it can; but it needs to also be able to convince me that my doubt is misplaced. Writing technical specs is like writing laws; you're using vague words to describe something precise. We don't use machines to interpret laws, and I don't trust machines to interpret specs.