3 ms·
IPv6 behind an equivalence of NAT is. :D
by izacus 3y ago
IPv6 behind an equivalence of NAT is. :D
- themoonisachees 3y agoYou seem to be conflating a stateful firewall with a NAT. Unless you really need to, you're never doing NAT on ipv6.
- izacus 3y agoNo, we're not doing NAT, but the devices aren't really accessible from the wide web either. In this case "NAT" is just an implementation detail and getting rid of it didn't bring any of the benefits IPv6 promised.
- throw0101c 3y ago> No, we're not doing NAT, but the devices aren't really accessible from the wide web either. Which is a policy issue (implemented through rules on a firewall), and not an inherent limitation of the technology (like NAT is).