3 ms·
"He chose not to disclose it for a reason, I'd respect his rights to privacy." But he did in a way disclose more than he had to. He didn't have to say he was s
by larrys 14y ago
"He chose not to disclose it for a reason, I'd respect his rights to privacy."
But he did in a way disclose more than he had to. He didn't have to say he was suffering from an incurable disease. He's not the CEO of a public company. He could have simply said he wanting to cut back because of either "personal" or "health" reasons that he'd rather not talk about.
If he wants privacy he revealed TMI, info "incurable" that will only lead to more speculation.
- vm 14y agoRemember he sent this in a private note to Sequoia investors. Although you'd expect something like this to leak, it was still not public communication.