3 ms·

Firstly, Linus is an Finish-American citizen of born in a Swedish minority in Finland, living in the US, so how how would that make Linux in any way "European"?

Firstly, Linus is an Finish-American citizen of born in a Swedish minority in Finland, living in the US, so how how would that make Linux in any way "European"? Even if he weren't a US citizen living in the US, it would still be hard to call Linux "European" due to the following point: Linux the project is a collaboration from contributors from across the world, so how would that make it "European"? Just because the project was started by an EU citizen in the EU over 3 decades ago, doesn't really give the EU claims of ownership over what is essentially a public open project, even if the EU were to somehow ever attempt to claim it as theirs.

vasac 3y ago
Small nitpick - Linux was created in 1991, while the EEC was transformed into the EU in 1992 (effective 1993), and Finland became part of the EU in 1995.
swores 3y ago
Companies like Facebook are global now, and we call them American because of where they were founded / where they are still HQ'd. Linux doesn't have a HQ or a stock market it's listed on, so isn't the place it was founded a reasonable choice if trying to describe it as anything other than "global"? Of course the EU can't claim to own it, just as they can't claim to own BMW if they chose to move all operations out of Europe, but we'd probably still call BMW a European / German company until it becomes established as being more to do with another single location rather than just all round the world.
- Rinzler89 3y ago
  There's a difference between something being "European" and something having started in Europe. Linux is not a private enterprise with an HQ in Europe so just because it started in Europe in the past, doesn't mean it's European today. Especially when the guy who started it all is now a US citizen living and working on the Linux kernel from the US with most of the funding for the contributions coming from US companies. So shouldn't it be American now?

vasac 3y ago

Small nitpick - Linux was created in 1991, while the EEC was transformed into the EU in 1992 (effective 1993), and Finland became part of the EU in 1995.

swores 3y ago

Companies like Facebook are global now, and we call them American because of where they were founded / where they are still HQ'd. Linux doesn't have a HQ or a stock market it's listed on, so isn't the place it was founded a reasonable choice if trying to describe it as anything other than "global"? Of course the EU can't claim to own it, just as they can't claim to own BMW if they chose to move all operations out of Europe, but we'd probably still call BMW a European / German company until it becomes established as being more to do with another single location rather than just all round the world.

Rinzler89 3y ago
There's a difference between something being "European" and something having started in Europe. Linux is not a private enterprise with an HQ in Europe so just because it started in Europe in the past, doesn't mean it's European today. Especially when the guy who started it all is now a US citizen living and working on the Linux kernel from the US with most of the funding for the contributions coming from US companies. So shouldn't it be American now?