> It doesn't have to be good or bad I think it's inevitably bad because dehumanisation ends in war. Dehumanisation, for me, is synonymous with violence. It isn

> It doesn't have to be good or bad I think it's inevitably bad because dehumanisation ends in war. Dehumanisation, for me, is synonymous with violence. It isn't just technology but the terrifying post-modern subjectivity that allows 8 billion people to co-exist in relative peace. "Accelerationism" looks set to build still more and better weapons, fewer ways of resisting using them, and less capacity to care, so I fear the colder future you speak of will be a nuclear winter. Of course, as you say, it's like some people want that.