4 ms·
I may not be part of the collective here, but I find it within the realm of acceptable that a $30,000 car would have issues that should absolutely not be presen
by notaustinpowers 3y ago
I may not be part of the collective here, but I find it within the realm of acceptable that a $30,000 car would have issues that should absolutely not be present on a $100,000 car.
I don't see Porsche's, Hellcat's, and BMW's having issues with something that has been a resolved non-issue for decades at this point.
- rascul 3y agoBMW has recently had a lot of issues over years with some PCV valve setups. Looks like they've recalled almost 1 million vehicles and have tried multiple times to address the issue. https://bimmers.com/blog/pcv-valve-heater-recall-explained/ https://bimmers.com/blog/pcv-valve-heater-recall-explained/ I don't know enough if that meets your requirement of "something that has been a resolved non-issue for decades at this point" but it's something that BMW has apparently been trying and failing to fix for awhile now.
- notaustinpowers 3y agoA valve for emissions is a fuck up, but not kind of fuck that that's the poorly made fake metal accelerator covers in a $100,000+ car can fall off and unintentionally accelerate the vehicle (which can go 0-60 in 3.9s) to a top speed on 112MPH, that's also made out of stainless steel that will destroy anything it hits, including you. I have higher expectations for my poorly made death machines.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoI think there's a floor for what should be acceptable at any price point. Rapid and unintended acceleration is below said floor.
- mort96 3y agoYou're demonstrating the problem with speaking overly generally. I too "find it within the realm of acceptable that a $30,000 car would have issues that should absolutely not be present on a $100,000 car". If, say, a plastic piece on the dashboard tends to develop an unsightly crack over time, that's more ok for a $30k car than for a $100k car. But some design issues should be present on no car; not a $30k car, not a $100k car, not a $5k car. "The car sometimes accelerates on its own" is one of these.
- notaustinpowers 3y agoYou're absolutely right, it is unacceptable for any car to unintentionally accelerate. But one of these issues being "our cheap floor mats move" when compared to "our $100,000 truck's fake pedal covers are made so cheaply that they break" showcases this disparity a helluva lot more.
- mort96 3y agoIt's certainly more embarrassing for the $100k car than for the $30k car, but neither is "within the realm of acceptable".
- notaustinpowers 3y agoTrue, I misspoke regarding "within the realm of acceptable". That's on me
- hermitdev 3y agoI have a hellcat redeye, approximately one of your $100k cars. I've thoroughly enjoyed the car in the nearly 2 years I've owned it. But, I'm barely over 6,000 miles, and I've killed 2 batteries and just had the starter replaced and a loose ground (fixed/replaced under warranty). The loose ground may not have been a factory defect: I had to have the wiring harness replaced after some rodents chewed through some of the wiring...
- FireBeyond 3y agoDodge probably also isn't a paragon of quality. And I will preface this by saying that Audi isn't without fault either, but my also $100Kish RS 5 has in two years had two issues: a battery failure (determined to be a battery fault, not a vehicle fault), and improper drainage in one of the doors, leading to an accumulation of water, that had a tech advisory to add an additional drainage hole.