4 ms·
> That's because it's not a benchmark, it's an explanation It's certainly an article that uses the word 'may' several times in the text, yet not once in its ti
by logifail 3y ago
> That's because it's not a benchmark, it's an explanation
It's certainly an article that uses the word 'may' several times in the text, yet not once in its title.
- adrianmonk 3y agoAnd? I don't see the problem. The title does include a qualifier: "good". If one product lives up to the potential that the technology (connection type) allows but another product doesn't, then I'd call (only) the first product "good".