3 ms·
IPv6 is unwieldy. The addresses are impossible to remember and hard to type. Most people don't need to do either of those things, but the people who manage syst
by caymanjim 2y ago
IPv6 is unwieldy. The addresses are impossible to remember and hard to type. Most people don't need to do either of those things, but the people who manage systems do. There's also little incentive for consumers and businesses to switch. The only way it'll happen is if it's imposed by large network providers.
Where I see it being useful is for IoT devices, where you're never configuring them manually, and where they probably only need to speak to one endpoint.
For anything that involves manual setup, you're going to have to force me to use IPv6, because I just don't care. Voluntary adoption is a pointless endeavor.
- daedalus_j 2y agoFWIW I really don't need to remember the IPv6 addresses of devices on my networks, DNS and my router handle that for me fairly automatically. I can even control how I connect to the device, either by using it's hostname on the LAN, it's WAN hostname, or it's VPN hostname. This has always been preferable to me over remembering IP addresses, even in the v4 realm. The only time v6 has ever caused me any difficulty is when dealing with services/tools that don't support it, but that's getting to be less and less of a problem even.
- mmh0000 2y ago> FWIW I really don't need to remember the IPv6 addresses of devices on my networks, DNS and my router handle that for me fairly automatically. That is true, but the OP said the people manage the network equipment. You do need to remember IPv6 addresses when your network is hosed when the DNS server becomes unresponsive or returns nonsense. IPv6 adds an annoying barrier to troubleshooting. Not that you can't work around it, but it does have more friction than troubleshooting IPv4 issues. I'm personally really torn about IPv6. On one hand, it technically is better, and for more reason than just the increased address space. On the other hand, it is more difficult to grok than IPv4. Especially because IPv6 does a bunch of magic that, if you're not on high-end networking gear, isn't logged anywhere.
- throw0101c 2y ago> You do need to remember IPv6 addresses when your network is hosed when the DNS server becomes unresponsive or returns nonsense. Who is going to remember the IP addresses of all their switches, routers, and firewalls even when they are IPv4-only? I have less than a handful of switches, and have no idea what the IPs are. Document the values (Netbox, MediaWiki, private company Github doc repo) and look them up if needed. Or put the values in the hosts(5) file of your management network bastion host(s).
- mmh0000 2y agoI mean... I can remember, off the top of my head, IPv4 DNS servers: 1.1.1.1 4.2.2.2 9.9.9.9 and more! Those are pingable as well which is just great when troubleshooting IPv4 I'll be damned if I can remember a single public IPv6 DNS server.
- throw0101c 2y agoAs a sysadmin, I'd be more interested in getting DNS working internally, and then having the recursive resolvers simply following the pre-installed root hints file * https://www.iana.org/domains/root/files https://www.iana.org/domains/root/files * https://www.iana.org/domains/root/servers https://www.iana.org/domains/root/servers and bootstrapping the network infrastructure from there.