The problem is that current LLMs are capable of creating junk that's prima-facie plausible in industrial quantities, and finding the sound material within it is

The problem is that current LLMs are capable of creating junk that's prima-facie plausible in industrial quantities, and finding the sound material within it is a big and growing burden for any organization, especially those that accept contributions from the public. > The type of person that would have AI generate a description and then not even read it also isn't going to follow the rules. This is not a sound argument against this rule; it is an argument for the proposition that current LLMs present a threat to the open-source model, despite this rule.