3 ms·
>The article is very light on methodology or actual data. That's because it's not a benchmark, it's an explanation.
by coldtea 3y ago
>The article is very light on methodology or actual data.
That's because it's not a benchmark, it's an explanation.
- logifail 3y ago> That's because it's not a benchmark, it's an explanation It's certainly an article that uses the word 'may' several times in the text, yet not once in its title.
- adrianmonk 3y agoAnd? I don't see the problem. The title does include a qualifier: "good". If one product lives up to the potential that the technology (connection type) allows but another product doesn't, then I'd call (only) the first product "good".