3 ms·
It's not common, no offense but you clearly have an axe to grind and started out with an incomplete understanding, so [citation needed]. Also, please do name a
by k8svet 3y ago
It's not common, no offense but you clearly have an axe to grind and started out with an incomplete understanding, so [citation needed].
Also, please do name and shame, especially since MICROSOFT MANDATES THAT SECURE BOOT IS DISABLE-ABLE (on x86 devices, anyway, we'll see what happens with Snapdragon X Elite devices).
- mistrial9 3y agolet's agree that real surveys of real equipment, with names and model numbers, are a "thing" .. yes
- k8svet 3y ago[flagged]
- k8svet 3y agoLOL mods. 1. The comment doesn't respond to any claims I made. 2. The comment doesn't do the bare minimum to back up their claims, after spouting already wrong information in this thread. (Sorry, not sorry, but if you're going to complain a device is non-compliant with MS's own SecureBoot requirements, it's really shouldn't be unexpected that someone might ask you to specify which device.) 3. Their comment is pithy, non-responsive, and doesn't advance the conversation in any meaningful way. And mine is the one that gets modded? EDIT: Also, a 22-hour old thread, with a reply getting flagged in <10 minutes. Hmmmmmmmmmm, wonder what that means.