> I fully agree re dogs, other's freedom end where my begins Probably why most pet owners in CH elect to keep cats instead. I support dog policies like cleani

> I fully agree re dogs, other's freedom end where my begins Probably why most pet owners in CH elect to keep cats instead. I support dog policies like cleaning after crapping, leash walking in public, maybe even barking hours, but dog licenses? License numbers? Mandatory insurance? Dog tax? This is a bit too much. What about working dogs, like sheep herding dogs? Switzerland is definitely not for me, even though it's nice to be able to vote minarets out of Geneva. I live in a country where dog ownership laws are not enforced and there are incidents every couple of years with people getting mawed or killed by stray dog packs. You also get to be chased or harassed by free roaming dogs as a cyclist or hiker, so it's a good idea to have pepper spray or hiking poles on you. What about churches? I was ready to question the court's decision. How much impact could a 8.7M nation living in a pristine country with a lot of train and bicycle usage for transportation have on GHG emissions, right? Then I saw the first post and thought about it, maybe the court was right?