6 ms·
You're trying to get redis to be what it isn't. Use a thing that has the properties you want: a document or relational database. If you insist on this then runn
by yuliyp 3y ago
You're trying to get redis to be what it isn't. Use a thing that has the properties you want: a document or relational database. If you insist on this then running a system that allows a ton of swap onto a reasonably fast disk might work, but is still gonna perform worse than a system that's designed for concurrently serving queries of wildly differing latencies.
- minitech 3y agoYes, that was the context: a Redis alternative to support the same operations but be what Redis isn’t.