4 ms·

> everything in the comment you replied to falsifies "So a strawman". No it doesn't, user exclaims their ignorance and your follow up emboldens their ignorance

> everything in the comment you replied to falsifies "So a strawman". No it doesn't, user exclaims their ignorance and your follow up emboldens their ignorance does not make a QED.

ben_w 2y ago
Does your understanding of reasoning consist solely of the dichotomy "every position is either a QED or a strawman"?
- latency-guy2 2y ago
  Does yours? > When every example you have of X is Y, it's not a "strawman" to say "all X are Y" — when you're wrong like that, it's a black swan. Either way, I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth, I hope you don't go around proclaiming you're the arbiter of all that's right in the world.
  - ben_w 2y ago
    > Does yours? The very thing you quoted demonstrates that mine allows for people to make errors without condemning them as deliberately weak setups. > I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth If you do not like how your words are perceived by others, you should consider choosing them more carefully. Despite your lack of appreciation, this comment is one which I am still only able to read in a way which suggests that you are stuck with this false dichotomy: > No it doesn't, user exclaims their ignorance and your follow up emboldens their ignorance does not make a QED.
    - latency-guy2 2y ago
      > The very thing you quoted demonstrates that mine allows for people to make errors without condemning them as deliberately weak setups. No. > If you do not like how your words are perceived by others, you should consider choosing them more carefully. Lets see, you deliberately trolling and being bad faith is somehow my issue. Interesting. > Despite your lack of appreciation, this comment is one which I am still only able to read in a way which suggests that you are stuck with this false dichotomy: No. You lack the fundamentals.

4 ms·

> everything in the comment you replied to falsifies "So a strawman". No it doesn't, user exclaims their ignorance and your follow up emboldens their ignorance

by latency-guy2 2y ago

> everything in the comment you replied to falsifies "So a strawman". No it doesn't, user exclaims their ignorance and your follow up emboldens their ignorance does not make a QED.

ben_w 2y ago
Does your understanding of reasoning consist solely of the dichotomy "every position is either a QED or a strawman"?
- latency-guy2 2y ago
  Does yours? > When every example you have of X is Y, it's not a "strawman" to say "all X are Y" — when you're wrong like that, it's a black swan. Either way, I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth, I hope you don't go around proclaiming you're the arbiter of all that's right in the world.
  - ben_w 2y ago
    > Does yours? The very thing you quoted demonstrates that mine allows for people to make errors without condemning them as deliberately weak setups. > I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth If you do not like how your words are perceived by others, you should consider choosing them more carefully. Despite your lack of appreciation, this comment is one which I am still only able to read in a way which suggests that you are stuck with this false dichotomy: > No it doesn't, user exclaims their ignorance and your follow up emboldens their ignorance does not make a QED.
    - latency-guy2 2y ago
      > The very thing you quoted demonstrates that mine allows for people to make errors without condemning them as deliberately weak setups. No. > If you do not like how your words are perceived by others, you should consider choosing them more carefully. Lets see, you deliberately trolling and being bad faith is somehow my issue. Interesting. > Despite your lack of appreciation, this comment is one which I am still only able to read in a way which suggests that you are stuck with this false dichotomy: No. You lack the fundamentals.