4 ms·
I've used SSDB[0] in the past for some really stupid large datasets (20TB)_and it worked really well in production [0] https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb https://g
by jetbalsa 2y ago
I've used SSDB[0] in the past for some really stupid large datasets (20TB)_and it worked really well in production
[0] https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb
- PlutoIsAPlanet 2y agoIts also worth checking out kvrocks, which is a redis interface on top of rockdb that's part of the Apache project, and very well maintained.
- mathfailure 2y agoAnd which is not in-memory at all.
- PlutoIsAPlanet 2y agoIt can cache in-memory using RocksDBs caching mechanisms.
- welder 2y agoI switched from SSDB to Kvrocks recently, because SSDB is abandoned and the author missing for 3 years now. I used to recommend SSDB, but now there's better alternatives available: https://github.com/apache/kvrocks https://github.com/apache/kvrocks https://github.com/sabledb-io/sabledb https://github.com/sabledb-io/sabledb
- akie 2y agoThese are great recommendations, thanks!