4 ms·
Same on twitter (as in the screenshot in the article) -- lots of regurgitative comments, adding words but stating nothing / rephrasing the parent tweet / etc.
by btbuildem 3y ago
Same on twitter (as in the screenshot in the article) -- lots of regurgitative comments, adding words but stating nothing / rephrasing the parent tweet / etc.
I think the next step is actually a big leap backwards - human-curated knowledge bases, islands in the sea of AI-generated noise.
- grugagag 3y agoLLM will be quick to catch onto the islands. They’d have to be private islands to fend off the corruption.
- the_af 3y agoDo you mean silos that LLMs and bots cannot access? Like the walled gardens of Slack, Discord, Facebook, etc? In that case the cure will be worse than the disease, in my opinion. I don't want a siloed internet. Silos exist and are bad enough now, imagine if in the future the only good, human-produced content is secreted away within them.
- spookie 3y agoYes, they'll most likely be private islands. Honestly, it won't be too bad now that I think about it.
- helf 3y ago[dead]
- toss1 3y agoIt will be ironically funny if the original Yahoo! model of fuman-curated search results wins in the end. Also, the LLMs aren't necessarily doomed. Presumably, the humans running them are looking out for the problems of inbreeding or LLMs-eating-their-own-excrement, and will implement some combination of not feeding that crap, and/or freezing the model at a peak point where the results are still primarily based on human creations. Perhaps ChatGPT 4.3 will be the peak? EDIT: typos