3 ms·
it's saying that anywhere that there was an sbin, it now is a symlink to it's sibling bin it's also saying that because /bin and /sbin point to their /usr coun
by chrsig 2y ago
it's saying that anywhere that there was an sbin, it now is a symlink to it's sibling bin
it's also saying that because /bin and /sbin point to their /usr counterparts, /bin and /sbin will point to /usr/bin
So currently:
/bin -> /usr/bin
/sbin -> /usr/sbin
/usr/bin
/usr/sbin
/usr/local/bin
/usr/local/sbin
we'll have:
/bin -> /usr/bin
/sbin -> /usr/bin
/usr/bin
/usr/sbin -> /usr/bin
/usr/local/bin
/usr/local/sbin -> /usr/local/bin
(all assuming that I'm parsing the description correctly)
which all makes sense, we'll have /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin, where the latter is for user-installed executables and the former for system installed executables.
- kuschku 2y agoPreviously, these folders existed: - /usr/bin, aka /bin - /usr/sbin, aka /sbin - /usr/local/bin - /usr/local/sbin Now, these folders exist: - /usr/bin, aka /usr/sbin, aka /bin, aka /sbin - /usr/local/bin, aka /usr/local/sbin
- jodrellblank 2y agoyou are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.