3 ms·
Something's amiss in the article. First there's this: "Result? Two! €160 quid for two clicks, each of whom looked at two site pages." Then: "Clearly something
by ajays 14y ago
Something's amiss in the article.
First there's this:
"Result? Two! €160 quid for two clicks, each of whom looked at two site pages."
Then:
"Clearly something is not right, so I decide to view the profiles of all those who clicked the ads. They hit one common spot – they were all in the UK. But they were aged from 13 to about 70, many were unemployed or in education, we even had a Muslim fundamentalist who is very concerned about things in Pakistan. Lots and lots of doting mothers with FB pages full of cutesy little life mottoes. "
Wait: is it 2 clicks, or 200 clicks??!?
- lwhi 14y agoThe first refers to people who visited the website from the Facebook page.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- lawdawg 14y agoActually, I find it somewhat concerning that advertisers can see the exact profile page of those clicking on their ads. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
- cbr 14y agoYou can't. He's confused.
- shimon_e 14y agoOne is referring to facebook page clicks. The other is talking about those who followed through to his site.