3 ms·
> So this is considering a scenario that isn't just expensive, but effectively impossible. Plants seem to do OK. I mean, fine, there are technical arguments t
by ajross 3y ago
> So this is considering a scenario that isn't just expensive, but effectively impossible.
Plants seem to do OK. I mean, fine, there are technical arguments to be had, but have them with details and not hyperbole. Starting from that kind of position is ridiculous when there's an existence proof all around you.
- kiba 3y agoPlants also respirate. Not to mention animals respirate. Fungus break down plants. Granted, plants do generate net Oxygen even with their requirement for respiration, but don't forget everything that depends on plants.
- ajross 3y agoRight, and I'm just saying "granted, plants do generate net oxygen" is an awfully big caveat to "You can't capture CO2 unless we have vast amounts of carbon free energy". These arguments need to happen with numbers, not blanket dismissals.