> I thought net neutrality was about ISPs trying to get netflix, facebook etc to pay them extra not to throttle. It was mostly. Basically in the USA it costs m

> I thought net neutrality was about ISPs trying to get netflix, facebook etc to pay them extra not to throttle. It was mostly. Basically in the USA it costs money to peer with people, and even more money to put edge caches inside the ISP's network (because that means the ISP can't charge for peering.) This pissed of a bunch of rich web firms, so they poured money into pro net neutrality publications. (also a lot of anti copyright stuff as well, so they didn't have to pay content creators, but thats a different topic) In the UK, peerings is much much cheaper because of LINX and other peering exchanges. moreover, having an edge cache inside your network saves you cash as you don't need to spend as much arranging upstream peering. (It might save money on transfer between last mile and the core network, but I'm hazy on the costs there.)