When I worked a lot with government this used to be a big problem. Some minor tangential point in a finding would be slighty off or not adequately supported and

When I worked a lot with government this used to be a big problem. Some minor tangential point in a finding would be slighty off or not adequately supported and people would jump on that, ignore the rest and pretend it invalidated the whole argument. It's mainly something that comes up talking to insecure bureaucrats that don't want to change.