2 ms·
> You'll note the article doesn't mention method_missing even once, That's because `method_missing` isn't the subject of the post. Are you also going to point
by krainboltgreene 3y ago
> You'll note the article doesn't mention method_missing even once,
That's because `method_missing` isn't the subject of the post. Are you also going to point out that the blog post doesn't mention Eigenclasses or Jim Weirch?
> and in general method_missing is rarely used much in modern Ruby meta programming, for good reason.
You're just extremely wrong.
> I'm not trying to convince you Ruby works better for you
I've been doing Ruby for 15 years, I don't think you could.
- vidarh 3y ago> You're just extremely wrong. I am not, but given the extremely combative attitude of your comment while you've not provided any actual arguments, it's clear you're not interested in actually discussing the subject, but rather getting out aggression, so take care - I won't waste my time on any further conversations with you.