3 ms·
To me, this rule looks like horoscope. Is HTML+CSS+JS more powerful than React? Is Excel more powerful than C? One could argue either way. The better rule is,
by metalspoon 2y ago
To me, this rule looks like horoscope.
Is HTML+CSS+JS more powerful than React? Is Excel more powerful than C? One could argue either way.
The better rule is, perhaps, apply KISS to your architecture choice.
If I can reduce 100 lines of HTMX into 10 in React, I'd choose React. Because KISS. But according to the least powerful principle, and the author's claim that HTMX is less powerful, I should choose HTMX. Nah...
- recursivedoubts 2y agoi think what you would find is that for many applications htmx would be less code: https://htmx.org/essays/a-real-world-react-to-htmx-port/ https://htmx.org/essays/a-real-world-react-to-htmx-port/
- metalspoon 2y agoThat's not my point
- recursivedoubts 2y agooh, rather carry on
- SPBS 2y agoThen what's your point? Writing fewer lines of code in a less powerful language to accomplish the same thing as JavaScript is not KISS? React is web scale, use React?