4 ms·
Yeah, because without financial incentive, why would anyone bother to create anything? Even without protections, creators are going to make new stuff. Without
by sircastor 3y ago
Yeah, because without financial incentive, why would anyone bother to create anything?
Even without protections, creators are going to make new stuff. Without theses protections, maybe a dozen fewer lawsuits will be filed because quite frankly, most people can’t afford to pursue legal action, whether or not they’re in the right.
- otherme123 3y agoThe sad thing is that Michaelangelo was paid to do a lot of his art. And the David was a commision, he was creating art the same we are coding today: not for the copyright, but for a wage. It was financial incentive enough.
- doctorwho42 3y agoSo what you are saying is that the statue has been bought and paid for, so why do we need to pay a licensing fees for something made 15-20 generations ago (~510 years ago) that was paid for already. Do you get royalties for the code you write for work? Will your great-grand(x15-20)-kids get paid royalties for that JavaScript you made last year?
- otherme123 3y agoYes, that's exactly what my message says... almost word by word.