2 ms·
I believe that it's more about protecting the image of the artwork. Imagine using the statue to promote product X. Then imagine that every icon/building/etc. be
by HenryBemis 3y ago
I believe that it's more about protecting the image of the artwork. Imagine using the statue to promote product X. Then imagine that every icon/building/etc. being used to promote something that you/the nation goes against (i.e. the statue in the cover of a porn magazine, or a historical monument to promote the latest crypto-fraud-coin.
I understand that the Colosseum, the Acropolis, or the statue of David won't be physically damaged by such an ad, but still..
- darby_eight 3y agoYou're describing a more restrictive version of a trademark. Why don't they call it such?
- int_19h 3y agoAnd why does some modern nation that didn't even exist back when these works were created gets to claim this kind of right on them?