4 ms·
They would earn less money. > the power to change things, even without collectivizing. Not really it's a sort of prisoner's dilemma. The one who refuses to w
by kwhitefoot 3y ago
They would earn less money.
> the power to change things, even without collectivizing.
Not really it's a sort of prisoner's dilemma. The one who refuses to work stupid hours gets fired and someone else has their job. If they stood together then it might work.
- 317070 3y agoBut there is no one waiting for their job. In most places there is a shortage of doctors.
- lelanthran 3y ago> Not really it's a sort of prisoner's dilemma. The one who refuses to work stupid hours gets fired and someone else has their job. Is this relevant in a profession that already doesn't have enough practitioners? I mean, let's say there is a shortage of 100 doctors in a location that currently has 900. If you fire one, wouldn't they easily pick up one of the open 100 slots?
- kwhitefoot 3y agoThe individual concerned is still fired and has a harder time surviving than the company that fired them.