4 ms·
But the use of each work is very minuscule in sum and is generally, if not always, an original new work. How is a Mona Lisa in the style of Van Gho a violation
by nadermx 3y ago
But the use of each work is very minuscule in sum and is generally, if not always, an original new work. How is a Mona Lisa in the style of Van Gho a violation of the copyright of Mona Lisa or Van Gho? It is a new and unique work. Makes it a legitimate use. In fact, in certain cases the entire work can be used and is considered fair use.
- sebastiennight 3y agoAmericans do pronounce his name "Venn Gho", but it is spelled Van Gogh! Interestingly enough, there are many pronunciations of Van Gogh's name [1] (we French people say "Gog" rhyming with "dog"), but the rarest one is probably the one from his own native Brabant dialect. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh#cite_note-5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh#cite_note-5
- nadermx 3y agoI was more so talking about Van Gho the music artist[0], mixed with a bit of Mona Lisa the band[1]. But to each their own [0] https://www.facebook.com/VanGhoMusic/ https://www.facebook.com/VanGhoMusic/ [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa_(band) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa_(band)
- sebastiennight 3y agoLOL... I learned something today!
- jazzyjackson 3y agoI agree that images produced are not derivatives of any particular copyrighted work, instead they are derivative of all copyrighted work. I don't think OpenAI et al should get a free pass for finding a way to rip everyone off at once, but it's certainly a new frontier in law, hence the gray area.
- nadermx 3y agoWell, in copyright law there is the De Minimis Concept, which kinda sorta allows, as you put it, OpenAI to "rip everyone off", despite everyone holding what they originally had.