4 ms·
+1 for Claude Opus, it had been my go to for the last 3 weeks compared to GPT4. The generated texts are much better than GPT4 when it comes to follow the prompt
by Oras 3y ago
+1 for Claude Opus, it had been my go to for the last 3 weeks compared to GPT4. The generated texts are much better than GPT4 when it comes to follow the prompt.
I also tried the API for some financial analysis of large tables, the response time was around 2 minutes, still did it really well and timeout errors were around 1 to 2% only.
- cpursley 3y agoHow are you sending tabular data in a reliable way. And what is the source document type? I'm trying to solve this for complex financial-related tables in PDFs right now.
- Oras 3y agoAmazon Textract, to get tables, format them with Python as csv then send to your preferred AI model.
- cpursley 3y agoThanks. How does Textract compare to come of the common cli utilities like pdftotext, tesseract, etc (if you made a comparison)?
- Oras 3y agoI did, none of the open source parser worked well with tables. I had the following issues: - missing cells. - partial identification for number (ex: £43.54, the parser would pick it up as £43). What I did to compare is drawing lines around identified text to visualize the accuracy. You can do that with tesseract.